Digital Minds

Technology has and continues to change us in so many ways... And I'd like to focus on communication and writing with respect to how our minds become more digital.

I remember getting my first e-mail account during my first year of college. I think my adaptation to e-mail has influenced my slight distaste for talking on the phone. I am able to pre-contemplate what I am going to say, so began communicating with all of my friends and colleagues through instant messenger. I continued to do so throughout college.

Nowadays I continue to  communicate mostly through electronic mail communications and texting. This certainly would not be as second nature to me, and I certainly wouldn’t prefer e-mail over phone communications if it were not for this technology.

Do emerging technologies focus our senses or distort them? I personally believe that technologies can focus our senses but without purposeful thought it will distort them. As I mentioned above, I prefer electronic communication. Many people prefer the voice contact because it is more personal. If I thought I was closer to someone simply because we have a lot of electronic communication , I might have a distorted view.

Despite the lack of the "personal," I think written communication has taken a giant leap. I believe that students today are much better writers than ever before. They e-mail, type letters, instant message, and text each other all the time. Even though there is slang that is used in these types of communications it is far more than they were used to writing when writing was solely done on a type writer or even pen and paper.

I would certainly say typed communications has focused our abilities to communicate effectively through written language.

Cool Things

The most beneficial part of today's class was learning to be aware of the simple (and inexpensive)things one can do to enhance learning in the classroom. It's OK to be creative with resources that are either inexpensive or, simply, ready for the trash heap (so long as these resources are safe).

Here's a cool thing...

Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) is the use of any method other than speech and writing to achieve functional communication. It can be used with residual speech and can be unaided or aided. Unaided communication may include gestures, signs, voice interpretation or just simply using the body. Aided devices can be either electronic or non-electronic and they are used to transmit or receive messages. Devices are further defined as low-tech and high-tech. Low tech devices are those that do not need batteries, electricity or electronics and include writing, pointing or using a communication book. High tech devices permit the storage and retrieval of electronic messages, with most allowing the user to communicate using speech output.

I would consider these systems as both instructional and adaptive technologies. I say this because:

1. they are used with individuals as alternative forms of communication other than the use of one's voice (in other words, adapting to a person's communication abilities) and
2. they can be used to teach students.

Incorporating Augmentative and Alternative Communication systems in the classroom requires a lot of planning. First, it is important for all classroom constituents (especially teachers and teacher aides) to be adept and comfortable with using the system with the student(s) so that the student gets the most use of of the educational exchange. Additionally, UDL approaches in these case can be beneficial for all students in the classroom. If other students in the classroom are made aware of the system and can hopefully use it effectively, this can improve and increase the amount of interaction with the student(s) who need the AAC.

Planning with Technology

Instead of thinking of students in categories that label abilities and success in the classroom, teachers can understand and reach their students more effectively if their strengths, challenges, and interests are considered. In addition, the incorporation of technology in teaching requires thoughtful planning and considerations.

This lecture touches upon three networks essential to learning: recognition, strategic, and affective.

Recognition networks are specialized to sense and assign meaning to patterns or objects we see or come in contact with. They enable us to identify and understand information, ideas, and concepts. “To support recognition learning, [one must] provide multiple and flexible methods of presentation” (CAST, Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age).

Strategic networks help generate and oversee mental and motor patterns. They enable us to plan, execute, and monitor actions and skills. Affective networks are dedicated to evaluate patterns and assign them emotional significance. They enable us to engage with tasks and learning and with the world around us. “To support strategic learning, [one must] provide multiple, flexible methods of expression and apprenticeship” (CAST, Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age).

Rather than falling neatly into these categories, learners differ within and across all three networks. Considering student strengths and weakness in the context of the three networks help teachers develop a more wholesome picture of their students, noticing strengths, needs, and interests that easily could be missed if students are considered in categories. “To support affective learning, [one must] provide multiple and flexible options for engagement” (CAST, Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age).

To start thinking about students’ challenges and potentials in the framework of the three learning networks, consider whether a given characteristic relates to their ability to take in information (recognition), to plan and execute actions or skills (strategy), or to connect and engage with learning (affect). Then determine whether ithat characteristic is a strength, a need, or a particular interest.

The Power of Assistive Technology

Curtis Article: Disabled Bodies, Able Minds

Curtis' article highlighted assistive technology and the role that it can play in the lives of students with special needs. It highlighted cases where technology has allowed students to advance far beyond the what people with the same disability could imagine from 25 years ago. The article introduces "DO-IT" (Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology) and TACLE (Technology and Augmentative Communication for Learning Enhancement) which are advocacy programs for students with disabilities. These programs help students obtain the technology that they need to communicate, move, and work through their academic lives. This technology allows students to function in a classroom on their own and even do activities that they may have never thought that they would be able to do.

Technology has brought many abilities to all students. The kinds of activities that can be done using technology is really quite amazing. This article gave us quite a number of examples, like systems that are sensitive enough to track the motion of eyes, eyebrows that can ultimately translate that into spoken word to modifying a musical instrument to be played with a joystick. Having this technology makes a world of difference to these students who may feel that they are unable to do anything on their own or accomplish anything.

A Personal Perspective on Adaptive Technology: An Interview with Dr. Richard Keller

One important aspect of this interview is understanding the difference between assistive technology and adaptive technology. I found Dr. Keller's description of adaptive technology to be an important one, as he believes in "changing the technology. Change the environment. Change the interaction" instead of changing the person with the disability. I have a more firm understanding now after hearing these points as they are brought from a personal perspective. I feel sometimes we take things for granted and maybe forget by trying so hard to "change a person with a disability" to adapt to the environment instead of changing the environment to adapt to the person's needs.

Another important aspect is when Dr. Keller talks about awareness. Awareness is an important piece that individuals must understand and appreciate when including people with disabilities in society. As a society everyone should try to make the environment as accessible as possible to include everyone and to have people with disabilities overcome any obstacles they may experience.

Dr. Keller also mentioned how many technological devices offered to people with disabilities often lack necessary training or information on how to use these devices. It is especially important to not only provide the technology, but to provide instruction and training in the use these devices.

Adapting Classrooms for AT Users: Challenges and Solutions

This presentation provided commentary by experts in the field of assistive technology as well as videos of students discussing their experiences in their schools/classrooms. The panelists stressed how it is not too complicated or challenging for teachers to make adaptations or utilize assistive technology with students who have disabilities in their classroom. The student interview videos were important as they exemplified that participation in any way is so crucial to student self-esteem.

The experts provided a wealth of information and recommendations related to assistive technology planning and use. They also pointed out that students are good at adapting on their own, so it is important for teachers and administrators to maintain open communication channels with students about assistive technology.

All constituents - students, parents, educators, administers - play an important role in this process. Teacher preparation and collaboration between all constituents and stakeholders effect successful implementation. Also, all non-technology environments should first be considered when thinking about adapting a classroom. If it is not possible to provide an inclusive learning environment without technology, then one must next consider minimal (or low-tech) technology before considering a full gamut of technology use/incorporation.

IWBs in (My Workplace)

Admittedly, I'm having a heck of time envisioning how SMART boards (and the like) are going to flourish in higher education classrooms. The learning curve associated with IWB use can be a bit daunting to faculty or administrators use to paper, chalkboards, and overhead projectors. And if you are a technophobe, forget about it (maybe).

There are some presentation aspects of the software that I think can catch on in the higher ed classroom. The way one can present original slides, write on them, and then save them for future use is a neat feature. I also think that if students can be included to not only to write on the board, but to manipulate information in a way to spark critical thought, then it will catch on as a powerful way to engage students amongst themselves and the teacher.

I found the following video of a Physics professor who uses a SMART board in her class. It's not the most wholesome use of the board, but it does exemplify some of the usage considerations we were shown in class.

This is my second go-round with this course and the SMART Notebook assignment was challenging for me for two reasons:

• Lesson Planning - I'm completely not adept at this task; it's a very creative and technical process to build a good lesson.
• The learning curve with SMART, coupled with #1, made my brain hurt when trying to lean how to use the technology. 

Having the demonstration in class helped because I was able to make an analogy to how the software works. What worked for me was comparing it to web page building. With web page building, there is a need for logic and process when building your sites. When I applied a web page build process to the process of creating a SMART lesson, it actually finally clicked.

Let's hope the finished product is of some quality.

Related Article: The Rise of the Interactive Whiteboard in Higher Education

Web 2.0 Tools: Prezi

I've used Prezi before for a couple of final presentations, both for in-class and online coursework. Again, since I am not an educator, I have not used it in a teaching situation.

I think that this technology fulfills most of the principles of Universal Design (UD). It fulfills flexibility and use because it accommodates the user's individual preferences. The user can choose from many different presentation layouts, fonts, and font sizes. The user also has the option to put videos and pictures into the presentation. When giving a presentation, it can zoom in on the text that is being presented. It meets the principle of tolerance of error because the user is able to easily delete mistakes and other incorrect information. It is low physical effort because it efficiently guides users as they create their presentations. Finally, it fulfills size and space for approach and use because it is accessible from any computer that has an Internet connection.

The two principles that I think Prezi doesn't fulfill are equitable use and simple and intuitive. I don't think that this technology is useful to people with diverse abilities. For example, someone who has a visual impairment may not be able to use this program easily. Also, I don't think that Prezi is that easy to understand and has a fairly high learning curve for first-time users.